digipack inside

Thursday, 8 December 2011

evaluation 3


By using the feedback from our questionaire from Matthew's initial research. From this feedback we were able to proceed with our process of creating and developing our artist Iceburg.

After reading and processing our feedback we put together this compilation of the journey of our video and ancillary tasks.This video shows the development of our digipack as it took several edits before we were satisfied that we covered all that could and it was aesthetically pleasing.




Feedback for our rough cut can be archived from on earlier posts.
from this we constructed a director's commentary Matthew and myself about the Rough Cut of Matthew's edit which was very similar to mine and Manan's. 


 
We received a mixed reception for the shot of our dogs, some liked it but some of our target audience didn't. We were advised to use more shots of Josh from lower angles as we used one in an earlier rough cut which worked really well. We were also advised to remove the blur affect that was put in as it looked like we lost control of the camera rather than the effect we were aiming for which was to make it look as if the point of view was coming from someone who was drunk. Some of the lip syncing wasn't perfect, therefore we decided to cut some clips where Iceburg forgets his lyrics and add footage of him walking and acting up to the camera instead.


For the purpose of gaining crucial advise of how to improve and rectify the mistakes made in the rough cut we shared a copy of the video via facebook.






 This was the director's commentary of Manan and Matthew talking about the final cut which was edited after taking into consideration the comments from our first feedback.





No comments:

Post a Comment